Melba, yes, and the rules changed in a way that works in your favor since you asked this. Every answer above this one predates August 17, 2024, when the NAR settlement practice changes took effect, so the landscape is different now than what you are reading. Here is what changed and why it matters to you. Offers of compensation to a buyer's agent can no longer be published on the MLS. Sellers are no longer automatically on the hook for the buyer agent's commission. And any agent working with a buyer must have a signed written representation agreement, with their compensation spelled out, before showing homes. Practically, this means the listing side and the buyer side are now two separate negotiations rather than one bundled number. You negotiate what you pay your listing agent. Whether, and how much, you contribute toward a buyer's agent is a separate decision you make, and it is a genuine negotiation now rather than a default. Now to your specific idea, which is a good one and has a name. What you are describing is close to what the industry calls a variable rate commission. In the standard version, the listing agreement provides a lower rate if the listing agent also produces the buyer, because there is no second agent to compensate. It is legitimate, it is common, and it has to be disclosed. If you ask for it, most agents will at least discuss it. Your version is a little different, because you are asking about a reduced fee when you, the seller, produce the buyer. That is also negotiable, and it usually shows up as a named exclusion or exception in the listing agreement. If you already have specific people in mind, name them in the agreement before you sign, with an expiration on the exclusion. Trying to carve someone out after the fact rarely goes well. Be aware of what you are trading for in the variable rate scenario, though. If your listing agent represents both sides, they are either working under your state's rules for representing both parties or handing the buyer off to someone in their office. Confirm how your agent handles that, in writing, before you sign, and understand what changes about the advice you receive. The savings are real. So is the reduced advocacy. Go in with eyes open. Two more things that matter for a home you describe as above average price. Ask about a tiered structure rather than a flat cut. A common version is a base rate plus a bonus above a target price. That aligns the agent with getting you a higher number instead of a fast number, which on a higher priced home in a smaller market like Magnolia is worth more than a fraction of a point. Ask what specifically you are giving up. A lower fee is fine. A lower fee with no professional photography, no video, no print, and limited syndication is not a discount, it is a different and worse product. Get the marketing plan in writing next to the number. On a higher priced home in a rural market, where the buyer may come from Jackson or out of state, marketing reach is what finds them. And put every bit of this in the listing agreement itself. Nothing verbal survives a closing. I am a real estate professional, not an attorney, so have your agent or a Mississippi attorney confirm the dual representation rules for your situation. I am Zoltan Peresztegi and I work in Los Angeles and the South Bay. Magnolia is not my market, but I am glad to help you think through a fee structure if you want to lay out the specifics, and I can connect you with a strong local agent in southwest Mississippi. Zoltan


