Yes, you can sell it. The bigger question, and the one I would deal with before you talk to a single agent, is whether your insurance is still standing behind you, because a vacant house and a fire are a bad combination on a policy. Joe, your question came through with no detail, so I am going to cover the ground that matters and you can tell me which part applies. Start with the policy, today. Most homeowners policies contain a vacancy provision. Once a dwelling has sat vacant beyond a stated period, commonly 30 to 60 consecutive days depending on the form, the policy limits or drops certain coverages, and the carrier can also cancel or decline to renew. On the standard homeowners form, vandalism and malicious mischief specifically fall away after 60 consecutive days of vacancy. Fire is treated differently from vandalism on most forms, so do not assume you are denied, but do not assume you are covered either. The only thing that matters is what your policy says and what your carrier does with the file. Two moves that make a real difference: - Get the claim opened and documented properly, and read the vacancy language in your own policy before you have a conversation with an adjuster about how long the house sat empty. If the claim is substantial or the carrier starts leaning on vacancy, that is the moment to talk to a public adjuster or an attorney, not after. - If the house is going to sit while you sell it, call your agent and ask for a vacancy permit, an endorsement, or a vacant-home policy. Carriers will often write one when you tell them up front. What they do not forgive is finding out after a loss. Second thing, and people miss this constantly. Your mortgage company is almost certainly a loss payee on the policy. That means insurance proceeds will typically be issued jointly and the lender may hold and disburse them against repairs rather than handing you a check. If you intend to sell rather than rebuild, work that out with the lender before you list, because a pending claim and a payoff can collide at closing in ugly ways. Now the sale itself. A fire-damaged house sells, it just sells to a narrower group. Realistically your buyer pool is: - Cash investors and flippers, who will price to land value plus their profit and will move fast. - An owner-occupant using a renovation loan. Ask a lender about FHA 203(k) or Fannie Mae HomeStyle. These finance the purchase and the repair together, and they open up a much better buyer than the cash crowd, though they are slower. - Somebody buying it for the lot, if the structure is far enough gone. Pricing follows from that. For a badly damaged structure, the honest starting point is land value less demolition and less the risk premium a buyer takes on for the unknowns behind the walls. Anything above that has to be earned with evidence, which means a contractor's scope and estimate in hand rather than a hope. And do not shortcut disclosure. Selling as-is does not reduce what you have to tell a buyer. Fire, smoke, water from the suppression, and anything that was opened up and not repaired all get disclosed. Massachusetts has its own disclosure rules and its own timing, and getting this wrong is how a closed sale turns into a lawsuit two years later. I am a real estate professional, not an attorney, a public adjuster, or a Massachusetts licensee, so please take the insurance and disclosure pieces to people who are. My name is Zoltan Peresztegi and I work in Los Angeles, the South Bay and on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, and I have handled fire-damaged property here, which is why the insurance sequencing is the first thing I raised. Deal with the policy before you deal with the listing. Zoltan


