Mark, the rate does not change with value automatically, but the dollars absolutely do, and that is exactly where your leverage lives. Before anything else: every answer above mine was written before August 17, 2024, and the rules changed that day. So here is the current picture. Since the NAR practice changes took effect, offers of compensation to a buyer's agent can no longer be published through the MLS. Sellers can still offer to pay a buyer's agent, and can still offer concessions, but it happens outside the MLS and it is a separate negotiation from what you pay your own listing agent. And any agent working with a buyer now has to have a written agreement with that buyer before touring a home, spelling out what that buyer's agent gets paid. The practical effect for you as a seller is that the old single number is now two conversations, and both are negotiable. Now, to your actual question. Commission rates are not set by any association, any MLS, or any law. They never have been. There is no rate that "is" the rate. What exists is a norm in each market, and a norm is just a starting point in a conversation. Does value affect it? Here is the honest answer. The work of selling a $250,000 house and a $900,000 house is not the same, but it does not differ by a factor of three and a half either. Photography, staging strategy, showings, negotiation, escrow management, and the hours involved do scale somewhat with price point, because higher-priced homes generally take more marketing and a longer runway. But they do not scale linearly with the check. That is precisely why higher-priced sellers have real room to negotiate and lower-priced sellers usually have very little. So the practical answer is that rates tend to compress as price rises, not by rule but by negotiation, because at a higher price a smaller percentage still funds a serious marketing effort. The structure nobody in this thread has mentioned, and the one I would actually ask for: a graduated commission. You agree on a base rate up to a target price, and a different rate on every dollar above it. Say a lower base rate up to your expected value, and a higher rate on anything over. Now your agent has a direct financial reason to fight for the last twenty thousand instead of pushing you to accept the first clean offer. It aligns the incentives instead of just cutting the fee, and a confident agent will usually take that deal. Two cautions. Do not shop on rate alone. The cheapest listing fee is a bad trade if the marketing is weak, because a 1 percent savings on commission disappears instantly against a 3 percent shortfall on price. Ask what specifically is being done to sell your house, get it in writing, then negotiate the fee against that plan. And ask what happens to the buyer-side compensation question in your specific market. In some markets sellers are still commonly offering it, in others buyers are covering it directly, and it materially affects your net. Your listing agent should be able to tell you what is actually happening in Western New York right now, not what happened in 2023. I am a real estate professional, not an attorney, and New York transactions are attorney-involved, so loop yours in on the listing agreement before you sign. My name is Zoltan Peresztegi and I work in Los Angeles, the South Bay and on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, so I am not the person to list a Buffalo house. If you want an introduction to a strong listing agent there who will discuss a graduated structure without getting defensive about it, message me and I will make one. Zoltan


